Language proficiency gap and group functionality in a Japanese-English e-tandem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.9.41836Keywords:
e-tandem, Japanese-English, proficiency gap, reciprocity, autonomyAbstract
This study assesses how gaps in language proficiency affected outcomes in a Japanese-English e-tandem between university students from the UK and Japan. Previous research has shown that a significant gap often gives less proficient students a sense of inferiority and embarrassment (Lewis & Qian, 2021; Luo & Gui, 2021; Tian & Wang, 2010). As a result, they may adopt avoidance strategies, and there is often an overuse of the stronger L2 that prevents the group from achieving the intended goals (Ryder & Yamagata-Lynch, 2014; Tian & Wang, 2010). Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview data collected from the participants showed that whilst the above phenomena occurred, the more proficient students in the less successful groups were often not reciprocal and lacked facilitation skills, resulting in insufficient opportunities to practice the weaker L2 (i.e., Japanese). To ensure more reciprocity and facilitation in e-tandem with asymmetrical proficiency, we suggest providing pre-sessional training to inform the participants about the positive and negative impacts of proficiency gaps and to equip them with strategies to overcome the potential challenges. Likewise, intervention and monitoring by the facilitators are suggested to address problems as they arise.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanako Fujino, Andrew Ryan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All our authors retain their copyright and all rights associated to their work, and what we ask in return is a mere non-exclusive right to publish their work in print and electronically. This means that authors are free to do whatever they want with their article, even republish it elsewhere, as long as the original creation is properly credited.
Each accepted article is published under a Creative Commons licence. Although we apply a CC BY licence by default to all individual articles, we believe it is fair-minded to let authors decide the level of restriction of their licence should they wish so; see our Licence policy for additional information.
